All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace
June 7, 2008
All Watched Over
by Machines of Loving Grace
by Richard Brautigan
I’d like to think (and
the sooner the better!)
of a cybernetic meadow
where mammals and computers
live together in mutually
programming harmony
like pure water
touching clear sky.I like to think
(right now, please!)
of a cybernetic forest
filled with pines and electronics
where deer stroll peacefully
past computers
as if they were flowers
with spinning blossoms.
I like to think
(it has to be!)
of a cybernetic ecology
where we are free of our labors
and joined back to nature,
returned to our mammal brothers and sisters,
and all watched over
by machines of loving grace.
I’ve been reading Brautigan’s ”Trout Fishing in America”, which is only ostensibly about trout fishing in america. He’s a fascinating character. After years in obscurity, and a period of “convalescence” (including ECT) after being diagnosed as schizophrenic, he achieved critical acclaim for his poems and novels. When The Beatles set up their artsy-fartsy spoken word label “Zapple”, he was their first signing. Allen Klein wouldn’t let them release it, but it came out on Harvest a few years later.
“All of us have a place in history. Mine is clouds.”-Richard Brautigan
this is a fascinating blog Mr Schmoel. The DNA s/w looks amazing – but I’m just wondering whether it would be easier to re-record the music than master the program?
Why thankyou Alan.
This was one of the thousands of comments when the video was released on youtube. The spelling is lamentable, but it’s a good argument.
“what your trying to argue is that a tool makes us lazy. So I could resay this as “Those assholes made a calculator, and now any average joke can calculate those standard deviations with ease that einstien only imagined…” If you are trying to argue that most people are lazy, then yes your right… but just because they make a calculator, doesn’t make everyone a regular Pathagorean, that takes dedication hardwork and talent…”
This software is just another step towards real musical interaction between humans and machines, just like Toffler and Kurzweil predicted.
Obviously it can be used to correct imperfect performances, but it has so many other uses which are more creative.
Would you use the same argument against photoshop?
Hey Mr Schmoel,
I think the guy with the literacy problem was trying to defend tools like DNA against the charge of creating ‘lazy’ musicians. That’s not what I was pointing out. I just wondered whether the whole thing was so complex that it may have been easier to start again with real instruments. Of course I agree that DNA could itself be a very creative tool.